Journal Article " TRUTH" (French Canadian Vigilance Committee), May 1963
The Freemasons are among us ... DR JACQUES ROUSSEAU
ACCUSED
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Rousseau_ (botanist)
"Truth, Justice, whatever the cost" is the goal of the Committee of Vigilance. That's why we open our readers the record Jacques Rousseau.
Dr. Jacques Rousseau is considered one of the few French-Canadian scholars who have achieved international fame. He has published over 450 (four hundred fifty) studies scientists. It is known in science as the leading international expert in botany. Many plants bear his name. Jacques Rousseau has received honorary degrees from around the world.
His brother (Andrew) was minister in Quebec City last government Lesage. Two of her brothers died for the liberation of France as an officer in the Canadian Army.
Dr. Rousseau is not about politics. It is not linked to any party. He is a man of science, who wants an honest and objective.
In November 1956, Dr. Jacques Rousseau was appointed director of the Museum of Man in Ottawa.
On 28 February 1959 the Government of Mr. Diefenbaker thanked him for his services by decree.
Dr. Jacques Rousseau accuses ... He denounced the Anglo-Saxon groups and Freemasonry, he explains that to achieve a high position in government, you must:
1. - Be yourself a Freemason;
2. - Or collude with Freemasonry;
3. - Or even succeed in being accepted by "concessions" that are very similar to licking the boots of prolonged Anglo-Saxon ... or Masonic.
The Committee of Vigilance brings you the overwhelming testimony of Jacques Rousseau.
"Great Masonic. I have many friends who are Anglo-Saxon Masons. And who are more decent. What they see in the masonry, is the ideal of mutual aid. But as careerists enter the box, this ideal will be immediately turned to their advantage and necessarily directed against other people.
1. When I introduced myself to the civil service examination at the request of the then government to apply for the post of Director of National Museum, he has committed all sorts of irregularities including the Assistant Deputy Minister of Ministry North Side Ernest, was the center, and that in order to eliminate me. Ernest Cote, suspected of being a member of the masonry, then told me: "Masonry is against you." Two years later, citing this sentence Faibish Roy, secretary of the Minister of Northern, I knew Mason (because he wore the button on the lapel ad hoc), it became very angry, as if he had discovered a gesture of betrayal. It made me confirm the above sentence, told me to be sure it was Ernest Côté told me that and not another. Then he added: "Cote is going to hear about it."
2. The Honorable Lesage, then minister of North Side and announce to me that my appointment is in two stages. They call me first to the rank of division director, then a few months later, give me the rank of deputy minister. Indeed, if I agreed to go to Ottawa, it is only with the rank of deputy minister. I realized later that it was time for me to enter the "club" appropriate.
3. The next day I arrived in Ottawa, Marius Barbeau insists that I go to a meeting which concerned mainly the metropolitan district of Ottawa and the Art Gallery. I found there including a large industrial Ottawa, which invited me to lunch in the past two or three days. For dessert, it gives me first to join the "club" Rideau then enter "In the group The Whole That has influence in Government circles. We Have A Few French Canadians, and your qualifications and According To position one you are eligible. I Guarantee your admission. " I politely declined saying that I belong to any group and I am not interested in either the Knights of Columbus and the Ordre de Jacques Cartier while that does not underestimating the interests of these groups and fully understanding that people aspire to become members, it was the nature of my job (Director of the Museum of Mankind),
asking me to have cordial relations with all ethnic and religious country, I suggested to refrain from joining a closed movement. "Think about it said the industry is that there is any influence, and this is essential if you ride the next level (there was a level above that of sub Minister) and that you have the opportunity to increase your income. "
Since then, two masons, one in Montreal, one in Europe, told me spontaneously, "I received an invitation to become a mason and I had declined. The European added: "If I knew you would not remain." The Canadian told me (there are only a few weeks): "Once you were tagged and placed on the enemies list."
4. A few days after lunch with the manufacturer, my subordinate Marcel Rioux, son of Marius Barbeau, came into my office and spoke spontaneously of masonry as follows: "Here," he told me he is important for an institution to be director of masonry. Father Levesque believes that we have the right to belong in these conditions, even as Catholics. "
5. During this conversation, Rioux I suggest entering a movement that aims "to install in Quebec secular schools, eliminate the current superstition reigns and return to the parish priests sacristy their field. " Maurice Lamontagne and ( Eugene) Bussières today's Arts Council, are also included. Rioux adds that there is no hope as Duplessis came to power and it will probably take five or ten years is to say, the advent of the Liberals in power. I replied that parents are sovereign in education their children. I'd be willing to help Muslim parents who want to establish here a Koranic school. I recognize that agnostics have the right to give their children education agnostic. If I was an agnostic myself, my children certainly will not go to Mass and in schools run by communities. As I pay now to give private lessons and Catholics to my children, I would do well to raise them into agnosticism if such was my state of mind. Rioux A report that just completely atheist, I declare myself surprised that he sends his children in Catholic convents instead public schools in Ottawa and it makes them go to church. He replied that in the current context, this is needed to not have too much difficulty.
6. I refused to enter the two movements. From that moment, Barbeau and Rioux, which until my arrival in Ottawa invited me to sleep and take meals with them, not me never again invited back and have become decidedly hostile to me. A few days later Rioux told me his intention to leave for the University of Montreal, where the rector Lussier, it seems inviting him to become director of the Faculty of Social Sciences. About Barbeau, he continued to beg for personal favors, but no longer makes any collaboration. Rioux, for its part took care to systematically undermine me with Maurice Lamontagne, Councillor for St. Lawrence. At that point one day meeting with St. Lawrence at a reception at the Embassy of Ireland during the St. Patrick's Day, three months after taking office, Saint-Laurent I abruptly turned his back when I had mentioned my name . I would like to add that St. Lawrence had led me to the open hand, inviting me to decline my names and titles with the question: "Sir?" apparently taking me to a foreign diplomat.
7. Before I take my job, my appointment was held November 15 and I took office on 1 January 1957, Rioux Montreal calls me to tell me that the Assistant Deputy Minister, Ernest Cote, archaeologist and MacNeish itself, Rioux, had decided to dismiss an archaeologist named Thomas Lee , I had never met. If I agreed, would draft the recommendation side by MacNeish and Russell (Director of the Museum of Natural History and Acting Director of the Museum of Mankind). The reason was that Lee did "not want to collaborate with colleagues." "It was not, "said Rioux, who asked a question in itself an urgent solution, but we wanted to take this opportunity. As it was Anglo-Saxon and French-Canadian myself, I would not wear the odious burden of having fired a person from another ethnic group. Anyway, Rioux added, if the thing does not happen immediately, I would find out at my appointment and that the thing I needed to make that decision. "
I'm me and I objected, I said I'd take my responsibilities. And moreover, I object to what is fired anyone during the 45 days between my appointment and I took office, to unless new developments occur, scandals, etc ... requiring rapid action. Do not know yet Rioux, and MacNeish, I was convinced they were right and I would have to dismiss Lee. So I began investigating the day of my arrival at the office Jan. 2, 1957. I discovered that the charges against Lee were groundless, he was the most skilful archaeologist of the country that had the greatest archaeological discoveries in Canada and that earned him the animosity of MacNeish, and another archaeologist of the Museum, an ambitious named Taylor who incidentally had received Lee's first training archaeological. I discovered that Lee, instead of the mania of persecution, as I had said, was actually persecuted. Following my departure, Lee resigned knowing he had no chance. The Deputy Minister also side had done everything to discredit Lee to me, presenting false reports.
8. It is important here to mention MacNeish, archaeologist. He is a former boxer from Chicago, a featherweight champion. It needs no more to know that he attended the underworld, since professional sports such as wrestling, is in the hands of the underworld. Man of no ethics. Sot, making proposals to any woman he found attractive. No professional ethics: he falsified accounts and even science. The minister knew that. I spoke one day to the secretary of the minister, Roy Faibish, and he said: "For no consideration, MacNeish can go. And as he does not agree with Lee, Lee who is from . But I knew that Faibish was a mason. One day in my office the fighter archaeologist, MacNeish, I had just caught in the act of impropriety raised fists against me but failed to touch me just because the desk between us and it was too small. There was a witness at the scene. Following this, Ernest Côté told me that since there was disagreement between me and my subordinate MacNeish I should leave.
9. I recommend one day promotion of an Irish Catholic. He did fulfill a post but did not give him proper treatment. "These people, my side says, are our enemies." If the person in question was of masonry, the promotion will be made. I got confirmation when we tried to impose on me a mason, incompetent other. No recommendation of the Director of the Museum was followed. It was always against.
10. One day I was summoned urgently to the civil service because a candidate for a senior post in the museum was by chance coming to town and wanted to take this opportunity to examine him and thus avoid costs. I knew during the subsequent meeting that his travel expenses were paid by the Civil Service Commission. The person in question came under discussion with the insignia of Masonry, the triangle and square, large (about two or three inches high) pinned to the jacket. All other board members, members of the civil service and the director Museum of Natural History, are the wonderful and want to engage the bench. Yet, the candidate had behaved like an idiot. At this time, I produced a letter from the direction of the British Museum from which I was informed after he learned through an indiscretion that we envisaged the appointment of that person. The letter writer said that one who had an opinion on the candidate and who was one of the greatest authorities of museums in England was: "most emphatic in us not to Employ Recommending that man".
11. Invited by Diefenbaker to go to his office (when I was asked in the interview stating that I had only two mornings at my disposal, which was perhaps impertinent), Diefenbaker wonder abruptly after 50 minutes of conversation - "What is this sex affair That Is reproached to you". I jump and leap in indignation at such a lie. "But he says it is the case that you are charged in the report of Deputy Minister."
- "But I replied, I've never seen that report to the Deputy Minister and we will not even tell me what the charges are against me. They told me the Deputy Minister Robertson confidential. " Diefenbaker then changed the subject, declaring myself that I may be unfairly attacked, but is not capable of investigating over its ministers and must give them their responsibilities. A few hours later, Roy Faibish, Secretary to the Minister Alvin Hamilton, then minister of the North, call me, indignant, almost in tears, told me that he and his minister were, to be yelled at by Diefenbaker and this might have for them unfortunate consequences.
12. I asked at the same time an interview with Robertson, of the executive body of the union which I belonged. I asked to see and read the report forthwith cons moi.Robertson I declare that the report as the charges are confidential. The group union behaved very badly, asking only for routine matters and avoiding to intervene to support the claim. In this interview, Roy Faibish Secretary to the Minister Alvin Hamilton was present and wore his badge with morgue Masonic large model similar to that which had brought the candidate to review the civil service.
13. when I was based in France at the Sorbonne, the secretary of a member to me nice, but seemed to belong to the masonry, a party leader then (Hazen Argue), made me say I do never had to try to return to Canada "that I Would Be crucified" and that even French Canadian institutions would be closed to me. Indeed, just when McGill was ready to call me, the case has fallen sharply. Same thing at the University of Montreal. At Laval was also tried to prevent me from being appointed and was Archbishop Vachon, the appointment would not have made.
14. The Honorable Chevrier, who among the Anglo-Saxons from Ottawa to the reputation of being a notorious Freemason wrote to my brother (who was Liberal minister in Quebec) that he and his party refused to do anything whether in my favor because "I had shown little sympathy for some of theirs. "But these people were only MacNeish, which has nothing to do with the Liberal Party, the Deputy Minister as an official side that did not take part in the policy of admission even Roy Faibish had betrayed the Liberals by giving the information to the Conservative cabinet, and Marcel Rioux, a government official (which is still true to the liberal policy even under Conservative rule) The authorities of the department knew it, but this activity was directed only against the National Union and especially Maurice Duplessis. Finally, Marius Barbeau, considered by all the people of Ottawa as a mason and non-party. Chevrier's friends talking about seem to people the "club" rather than party people. If Barbeau rebelled against me only because he asked for favors such an ineligible credits at the expense of museum members, delete the publication of research staff to publish more of his own work. Etc ...
15. I head one day with the Civil Service for the choice of administrative officer at the Museum. In the opinion of members of the Anglo-Saxon jury, a French Canadian, Edgar M. Charron is the only suitably qualified, I accept their decision and Charron was appointed. When I hear the news Ernest Cote, he enters in a fury and said that I should have blocked the appointment: "Remember that you and I are French Canadian and we have no incentive to name others."
16. After my departure, the Minister Alvin Hamilton met senior officials of his ministry, all Anglo-Saxon (I like the intelligence of a witness Anglo-Saxon) and declares that they have done a service by getting rid of me the reasons for my departure are not the ones cited, it has managed to silence all but two newspapers in the country and intends to shortly take steps to to silence members of the CCF who took my Defence. "As I helped you, he says he'll have to hire you to help me at least a few junior officials of the French language to show the électrat" Ottawa "is not against the Province of Quebec.
Dr. Jacques Rousseau.
0 comments:
Post a Comment